This post, Greenwood Self Service Storage <cc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Message-ID:<<2007082922520500927832364096298@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
|
|On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:38:55 GMT, Chris "Bill" Caputo
<res00351@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
|
|>Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
|>
|>>Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
|>>
|>>>Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:fb29ht$9ro$17
|>>>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>>>
|>>>>On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:00:03 GMT, Dustin Cook
|>>>><bughunter.dustin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
|>>>>
|>>>>>Someone is royally pissed off because I can code, and they can't.
|>>>>
|>>>>Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Dumbass.
|>>>
|>>>Okay then. The disassembly and location of the malicious code in the
|>>>binaries if you please. It's really simple. Provide the code I said
isn't
|>>>in those files. Prove me wrong.
|
| From: "(akula)" <akula@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
| Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
| Subject: Re: loonym, Leslie Paulin's ass sucker
| Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 00:30:02 -0000
| Message-ID: <3f20030517003002Z.15245763659@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
| One can only prove a positive, not a negative.
|
|>>Prove you can "code".
|>
|>Why don't you submit the files in question to Symantec, McAfee, et.al?
|
|Why don't you just release the source code? <G>
|
|You maliciously, deliberately and continually violate the GPL by refusing
to do so,
|Chris - the "source code" you provided is bogus.
|
|It's been over 4 years and you STILL steadfastly refuse to release it.
|
|To the contrary, the tricks you've pulled to date have
included............
|
|1) claiming you permanently deleted the source code out of fear;
|2) claiming later on that you didn't delete it but just refuse to post
it;
|3) claiming you posted the full source before, when in fact you never
did;
|4) lying through your teeth by claiming people bearing well-known nyms
made posts
| verifying and acknowledging receipt, examination and approval of your
source code,
| when in fact no such posts ever existed;
|5) providing phony source code and claiming it was real;
|6) pretending to not have seen the posts of multiple people with
programming
| experience who told you that what you provided didn't compile into the
binary you
| were distributing;
|6) creating bogus "duck'n'dodge builds" intended to take the focus on the
encrypted
| builds your lapdogs were distributing.
|
|Those and other tricks are discussed at http://sharkpost.isterrible.tv/
|
|>If one of the big anti-virus vendors determines the applications are
malicious,
|>you'll win the pissing contest.
|
|They wouldn't find it "malicious", Chris - you'd have already taken care
of that by
|knowing they don't possess the cryptographic abilities, and by knowing
they were never
|programmed with the intelligence to analyze a Message-ID for "Good =
Server's IP",
|"Bad = User's IP", "Good = User's Nym", "Bad = User's Name", "Good =
Pirated Software".
|And it's a safe bet 90% of the people working at "big anti-virus vendors"
<G> don't
|even know what the **** Usenet is - they don't operate that way, AS YOU
****ING WELL
|KNOW.
|
|>From my perspective, Dustin proved himself when he determined the packer
|>I used. That isn't a trivial task.
|
|From my perspective, you're lying through your ****ing teeth.
|
|>When I released the app 4 years ago, the number of crackers who could
unwrap
|>ASPROTECTed exes numbered in the single digits.
|
|ROFLMGDAO!!!!!!!
|
|When you released the app 4 years ago, Chris, AspackDie was already being
released at
|v1.4. It was freely available on a ****load of websites, and it was all
anyone ever
|needed to unwrap an ASPROTECTed exe...............well, that plus the
ability to click
|a mouse.
|
|So you're a lying cocksucker, Chris - you didn't need to be a "cracker
numbering in the
|single digits", all you needed to be was someone capable of fogging a
mirror.
|
|And you (and Dustbin) conveniently neglect to mention that the
"unwrapped" exe is
|516,096 bytes while the "source code" <cough> you provided compiles into
an executable
|bearing a different name, a different CRC, and a different filesize
(1,028,146 bytes).
|
|Also it hasn't been proven that the app was released by you 4 years ago
because the
|NarcPost executable in the zip provided is signed by PGP key 0x88B6A765,
which you
|REFUSE to acknowledge as belonging to you. You refuse to sign a Usenet
post with that
|PGP key as demanded in
|
| Message-ID: <gu27pkogkveakegas68i861aguidpm6uc3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|and you conspicuously ignore that post, pretending not to see
it.........WHY? <G>
|
|
| From: TheApostle <likes-to-****@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
| Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
| Subject: Re: Who is not a pedophile?
| Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:27:29 -0400
| Message-ID: <MPG.20ff4d873849604d989962@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
| People know the confirmed PGP key, and they refuse to sign with it.
| Proof positive that it isn't him.
|
|
|And do you have the Message-IDs of the "enlistment", "embrace" and
"invitation" your
|lapdogs keep referring to, Chris? All we did was make a post to Herb in
|alt.binaries.crafts.pictures mentioning NarcPost, and we crossposted it
to several
|newsgroups.
|
| Message-ID: <2007082407512704444714820102421@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|Dustbin saw our post and approached US by replying, saying "I'll check it
out".
|
| Message-ID: <Xns9996AE78B26CCHHI2948AJD832@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|We then replied back to Dustbin and said "Be advised you may not be able
to detect the
|program's true purpose". We reluctantly (but politely) wished him luck,
knowing ahead
|of time that the odds of him actually catching a Caputo payload would be
nil.
|
| Message-ID: <2007082421570600994352472894374@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|Dustbin has since littered the group with about 100 posts repeatedly
alleging that he
|couldn't find anything malicious, and ingeniously concluding that because
he was unable
|to find it that it therefore can't exist. <G> He showed off his wisdom as
an adult
|businessman and displayed the years of experience he acquired in the
cor****ate
|community by referring to those who rightfully rejected his nonsensical
contention as
|"total ****wits", "trolling dumb****s", "****sticks", "****heads", "sick
****s",
|"little puppets", "lamers", "lemmings", "incompetents", "dumb****s",
"idiots", "****ing
|morons", "paranoid ****ing morons", "ass raping morons", "extremely
paranoid non coding
|persons", "stupid ****s", "stupid people", "laughing stocks",
"simpletons", "wannabe
|script kiddies", "punks", "punk ass losers", "punk*****", "retards",
"****stains",
|"flaming faggots" and "warez pups".
|
|During his non-stop hissy fits Dustbin was ironically revealed to be
nothing more than
|a 29-year-old poseur from Tenesssee
|
| Message-ID: <2007082518445931086098518418061@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|whose past contributions to the community included writing viruses and
deliberately
|infecting other peoples' computers.
|
| Message-ID: <Xns9998EFF41CBD3HHI2948AJD832@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|The validity of his "expert credentials" was further strengthened after
he was
|uncovered stalking women online
|
|
http://groups.uffnet.com/groups?selm=Xns9842DEA9BE6FDHHI2948AJD832@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
|
|and using eBay to earn $5 for a dainty dinner dish. <G>
|
| Message-ID: <2007082622143455596735951997688@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|The experienced disassembler, respected businessman and virus writer who
gave a thumbs
|up to your narcware thereafter wisely and inspiringly suggested those who
disagreed
|with him "take a viagra and get some ass"
|
| Message-ID: <Xns99991326283DCHHI2948AJD832@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|and then officially concluded his "analysis" (prior to injecting 30+ more
flames) by
|stating "I asked you to show me this malicious code. Either do it, or
shut the **** up
|about it."
|
| Message-ID: <Xns9999F316290HHI2948AJD832@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|And that's what REALLY happened, peewee.
|
|The K00K KaMP's take on what's happened so far..................
|
|1. Tuber took time out from injecting nigger jokes
|
|
http://groups.uffnet.com/groups?selm=2pO2h.134076$R52.47506@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
|
http://groups.uffnet.com/groups?selm=W4q0h.701887$Jn2.124793@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
|
|to claim we "enlisted Mr. Cook to examine Sharkpost" (but Tuber
conveniently omits the
|Message-ID containing this mysterious "enlistment" <G>).
|
| Message-ID: <uI0Ai.17141$WO5.3014@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|2. TheApisshole took time out from expressing his true views on
pedophilia
|
| http://www.uffnet.com/kookkamp/leslie/pedodefend.htm
|
|to claim he "liked the part where we enlisted someone to find malicious
intent and
|back-stabbed the guy" (but conveniently omits citing the non-existent
Message-ID which
|contains the "part he liked" <G>).
|
| Message-ID: <MPG.213a7b28ed50f077989afb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|3. degassbag stopped flaming Tina's dead mother
|
| Message-ID: http://groups.uffnet.com/groups?selm=degaussed@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
|
|long enough to claim we "failed miserably" after "embracing and
enlisting" Dustbin (but
|conveniently omits any Message-ID outlining the mysterious goal we
"failed" at, any
|Message-ID containing the alleged "embrace", or any Message-ID containing
the alleged
|"enlistment" <G>).
|
| Message-ID: <30n6d3111n31u6a3h9qm96bevqtsfd2a3p@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|4. Dustbin repeatedly states "I was asked to examine some binaries", but
conveniently
|keeps forgetting to cite the Message-ID which reveals the unknown person
he claims
|"asked him" or the specific "binaries" he claims this unknown person
asked him to
|examine. <G>
|
| Message-ID: <Xns9998F251466E0HHI2948AJD832@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|5. And, last but not least, we've seen Not Telling But Being a Trolling
Lackwit jumping
|on the KaMP bandwagon by claiming he "distinctly remembers the UFF
politely asking Mr.
|Cook to look at akula's ****ware" (he's also conveniently Not Providing
the Message-ID
|of any post sup****ting his "distinct memory" <G>).
|
| Message-ID: <q8g6d39qmq0531curo5e2ltjti4ekrvd28@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|The binary you posted through that trojanned Verizon box, Chris, appears
to be a
|manipulated version of the "20030724 EXPERIMENTAL" build called "20060724
EXPERIMENTAL"
|(per the NFO file et al). The executable's size is 221,184 bytes and it's
called
|"SharkPst.exe". Removing ASProtect yields a binary that is 516,096 bytes
and has a CRC
|of 6B7768F6. The "source code" <G> provided, however, compiles into a
binary called
|"PostMost.exe" which is 1,028,146 bytes and has a CRC of F83907CB. We
told you most of
|this previously, Chris, you just keep avoiding it..............
|
|
http://groups.uffnet.com/groups?selm=2007032707450689197352662293296@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
|
|You duck'n'dodged the CRC issue for WEEKS after we made that post - and a
post you made
|a few days ago in alt.comp.freeware shows you were fully aware of what we
were claiming
|all along..................
|
|
| From: Bill <res00351@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
| Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware
| Subject: Re: butter in pretty soldier
| Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:33:38 GMT
| Message-ID: <t073d3l44o4lvvmmpdbckah8o9967f1ei1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
| You can check to see if they are identical by checking the
| CRC32 values for each file. If the CRC32 values are the same,
| then the binaries are identical. If they aren't identical,
| well, just don't use it.
|
|
|Since the "source code" provided generates a binary of a different name,
different
|filesize and different CRC, there is clearly nothing to indicate it can
ever be used to
|compile a binary equal to the one provided. Consequently there is no
purpose in
|analyzing the bogus "source code". However Dustbin, in his intense
analysis <G>,
|conveniently neglects to mention having analyzed the ALLEGED source code,
nor the
|obvious fact that it either (a) cannot ever be compiled into the provided
binary or (b)
|cannot ever be compiled into the provided binary without taking other
unknown steps.
|Even if unknown steps existed, Chris, they are NOT disclosed -
consequently the binary
|is maliciously CLOSED-SOURCE and in violation of the GPL. Anyone
distributing it is
|breaking the law, and what lies inside it can only be known to the person
who
|maliciously compiled it - as you yourself concede................
|
|
| From: "(akula)" <akula@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
| Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
| Subject: Re: What do you think of [...] the SharkPost warning
| Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:33:52 -0000
| Message-ID: <3f20060624003352Z.6537577159@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
| The reality of SharkPost is that I know exactly what code I added -
| you have absolutely no means of knowing. You can guess all you
| want, but you cannot _know_.
|
|
|And that sums it up. You and your chimps can keep screeching in your
cages all you like,
|nothing will change - the only result you'll get will be cage floors
riddled with
|spittle. http://sharkpost.isterrible.tv/
will continue to properly alert
naive newbies
|of the open-source-turned-closed-source binary maliciously coded by YOU,
a person who
|claimed an FBI agent signed his PGP key after being caught soliciting
Manatee "Vrodok
|the Troll" Memories to infiltrate Felions members for information
necessary to help you
|rat out posters to the FBI.
|
|Have a ****ny happy day, Chrissyp00.
|
TRANSLATION: I'll Just keep repeating the same babble and hope someone
buys it.
|
|
| ___ ___ ___
| / /\ / /\ / /\
| / /:/ / /::\ / /::\
| / /:/ / /:/\:\ / /:/\:\
| /__/:/ /\ / /::\ \:\ / /::\ \:\
| \ \:\ /:/ /__/:/\:\ \:\ /__/:/\:\ \:\
| \ \:\/:/ \__\/ \:\_\/ \__\/ \:\_\/
| \ \::/ \ \:\ \ \:\
| \__\/ \__\/ \__\/
|
| -=- Usenet Froody Fanbois -=-
| We've nuked hundreds of accounts in the name of
| free speech ....... and *yours* will be next.
| Please read
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.test/msg/6c6de46b9f184761
| -=- "Nuking Since 1998!" -=-
|
|
|From: Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
|Subject: Re: Bill "AKULA" whatever the **** nym he's using this week
|Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:37:38 GMT
|Message-ID: <Xns99999FDD1B54BHHI2948AJD832@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|He's just a lemming to me. Non coding wannabe ****ing warez pup who
|doesn't do a service to anyone. In the BBS daysm if you didn't know
|how to deal with a .zip file, you had no business in warez. What moron
|needs to write a faq about .zip files? LOL
|
|
|From: "(akula)" <akula@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|Newsgroups:
alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.warez
|Subject: The Daily Warezfaq - Thursday Edition
|Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:35:57 -0000
|Message-ID: <3f20030911153557Z.153260579@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
|Q: How do I decompress .zip files?
|
|A: Get WinZip. Setup is a snap. After downloading a .zip file, just
|double-click on it. It's very easy. Versions of WinZip starting with
|version 8.1 will also unzip multiple files at once. FTP sites have
|software that can read the file_id.diz placed inside of "zip" files.
|Also a lot of FTP software automatically "recognizes" zips as binary-
|format files, which are handled a different way from ASCII-based files.
|Using zips also allows the other sup****t files like keygens and cracks,
|etc. to be added without having to recompress the whole archive, and
|keeps them together. WinRAR will also unzip zip files.
|
|
--
X=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X
WAREZFAQ MAINTAINER Mjølnër EXPOSED
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: Not Telling but not Being a nutless coward [..] Mjølnër
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:41:10 -0200
Message-ID: <3qov12hku9usf7pgf5nsdpk2ikmlstnhvl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:24:16 -0500, Mjølnër
<mjolner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>No attempts are made to smear him, he does that entirely by himself.
TA has posted a ton of foolishness to Usenet; he has provided
countless op****tunities to mock him if you wish. That you choose
to use his bad arguments and legal ignorance to smear him as a
pedophile tells me two things:
1. You fools don't have the ability to spank him without
outrageously distorting the truth.
2. Batty/UFF stated that there was nothing that he wouldn't
do to achieve his goals. I despise him because of that
attitude. I believe you have the same attitude.
Have someone with an IQ on the right of the bell curve
complete the syllogism for you.
>If I damn pedophiles a lot, it is because they are among
>the most prolific posters in these groups.
No, you condemn those you accuse of pedophilia because you
don't have the ability defeat them without resorting to lies
and distortions.
X=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X
|
