Onideus Mad Hatter arranged shapes to form:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:33:57 +0100, Davémon <"davémon"@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
Firstly, I think its great that you chose to continue to talk with me
about this.
>>After all, you have never created anything of significance, nor have you
>>infringed upon anyones IP in any serious way. Isn't it also more the
>>point that your tiny little infringements actually mean nothing in the
>>real world, yet everything in your head?
>
> I gotcha, I can break copyright law and that's okay, but other people
> can't break copyright law because they're more serious about it.
I'm not sure I expressed myself clearly. What I'm saying is that you
/claim/ you're breaking the law despite the fact you are not.
Why do you feel the need to convince people that you are a 'criminal',
when you haven't actually commited any crimes?
Might this be related to the reason you pretend to be that guy you read
about in Wired magazine?
>>
>>Would you like to talk with me about it some more Matt?
>
> How come Getty completely ignored your whiney little email, Davey?
Do you think that 'being ignored', or 'having attention' are im****tant?
>
> ...eventually I WILL find some company dumb enough to try and sue me
> and I WILL use them to destroy the DMCA.
If you believe it hard enough, do you think it will come true?
I'm enjoying having this conversation with you, but as I think you can
gather, this is rather off-topic for ADG, so I've x-posted and set
follow-ups to alt.psychology.behavior.internet
If you'd like to continue talking to me about this, then I'll be more
than happy to do that there.
--
Davémon
|
