WHAT THE ARTIFICIAL ARGUMENT?
LEON m. Lederman in Symetry and the =93beautiful universe=94 has a humor
In that we move if
2
2 p
E =3D mc + =85=85 + =85. ( thank gods)
2m
2
but that again he say E =3D mc is also energetic by the authors.
( we do not necessary agree on that second equation, as the
symmetrical systems in spherical terms are oxymoronic: What does it
mean? If the perfectly clinch as the fantastic quarks and anti-quarks
wanna be, than there is no movement t and only
energy that IS, is used to keep the clinch).
I want to safe ***** of so many laureates of Nobels myself ,
especially that I do not know yet who was my student and who was not.
Usually, they are very good students and adjusting extremely well.
Problem was that Einstein school forced them to translate process
bounded phenomena to the perfect symmetry static equations, and they
had no say but to comply,. Dr Wilczek being one of the last victims,
skilled to bounce out of dyllema; but not =96 they keep inventing anti-
matter. Dr Wilczek did well resolving dilemma, but E school forces
scientist wrong direction. In nano terms not the structure decides the
course of energy movement ( transfers), but already flowing process as
motion. Why would scientists nowadays need immature static models?
Please form science sup****t confidential groups to stop producing
garbage on the very serious science topics, just to help Eistent in
that when Univese clinches in perfect symmetry that it also moves
simultaneously in his head only ( sorry =96 it does not move in
symmetrical terms )
Life motion begins with asymmetry in nano world; charging fields are
always developing of asymmetry. What for more wrong books and moronic
gymnastics. Mobilize self and end embarrassments,please.
Community please intervene against damming down the science in that it
is self evident that energy transfer occurs with asymmetry, that
nature in nano-terms creates most interesting forms of motion, but mc2
is only a capture in that clinch that does not move, nd do not
embarrass the universe any more; otherwise stones might start to talk
to us.
|
