On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:28:22 -0600, JoeC <ncoic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>malenoid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> On Dec 8, 8:43 pm, JoeC <nc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> I have read some of Critique of Pure Reason and Perpetual Peace. Here
>>> is a good link if you want to learn about philosophy:
>>>
>>>
http://www.amazon.com/Immanuel-Kant-Knowledge-Products-Philosophy/dp/...
>>>
>>> I do like many of Kant's ideas that of people are ends never means. I
>>> also like his ideas on reason. They have had an effect on me because
I
>>> never liked Utilitarian morality. I basically see it as selfish. I
>>> would like to find any thinking person that posts to the news world to
>>> discuss interesting topics.
>>
>> Ah, no, Kant did not write that people are never means, he wrote that
>> humanity, in
>> oneself and in others, should be treated NOT ONLY as means but also as
>> an end in
>> itself.
>
>I think is about wording people in Kant's morality are never means only
>ends in themselves as you said. Using people as means it immoral in
>Kant's world.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/#HumFor
--
fantasybedtimehour.com
www.kloonigames.com/blog/games/crayon/
|
