Talk About Network

Google





Professions > Philosophy Kant > Re: Unusual lin...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 46 of 50 Topic 481 of 533
Post > Topic >>

Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy of free will

by Michael Gordge <mikegordge@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 14, 2007 at 01:33 PM

On Nov 14, 5:16 pm, chazwin <chazwy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Determinism.
>  Nothing acts in contrdiction of its nature.

Those aren't my words, you dishonest desperate commie ****.

Reality has no contradictions, therefore when ewe come across one,
e.g. the Kantian piffle and the mystics bible, becoming a socialist,
you automatically know (a) that you're NOT dealing with reality (and
b) that a human being has ****ed up and big time with its version of
reality.

Contradiction is ONLY a dishonest human being pretending its
knowledge.

One of the contradictions required by you dopey ****ing leftist tree-
hugging slug ****ing retarded knuckle-dragging commie retards, is that
traditionally you embrace individual liberty (adults) in having their
own moral choices, e.g. in drug taking, poofterism, however you fail
to accept that people in business are embracing that exact same moral
virture, a moral choice to be left alone to choose, to keep and choose
what their energy and ideas produce.

Although more recently, the left have seen votes (their power) lost by
embracing too much liberty for poofters and druggies, so they have
done a bit of a ewe turn i.e. headed back to the sheeple on that one,
and the Right have seen votes (power) to gain by giving you ****ing
lazy ****ing commie parasite leftist retards what you dont earn.


Michael Gordge
 




 50 Posts in Topic:
Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy of
Scott H <zinites_page@  2007-11-09 11:19:03 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-09 11:39:41 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
"brian fletcher"  2007-11-09 22:47:54 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-09 15:33:58 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Don Stockbauer <donsto  2007-11-09 17:47:10 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-09 20:03:03 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-09 20:11:06 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 20:57:15 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-11 08:57:48 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-09 20:16:10 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-09 20:23:58 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-10 02:27:18 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 09:02:57 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 11:38:32 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Scott H <zinites_page@  2007-11-10 12:24:25 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Scott H <zinites_page@  2007-11-10 12:33:12 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 17:07:16 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-10 14:07:29 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-11 06:47:41 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-11 10:32:38 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-11 18:37:01 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-11 18:40:59 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-11 18:44:50 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 00:41:59 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 00:54:51 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-12 08:19:36 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 01:00:51 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-12 08:07:08 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-12 01:07:34 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 02:44:25 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-12 02:48:50 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-12 02:51:45 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-12 23:41:16 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-13 00:28:50 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-13 00:30:40 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-13 22:43:32 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-14 00:11:18 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-16 09:02:05 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-14 00:12:23 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-14 00:16:19 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
knucmo <stevejouanny@[  2007-11-14 03:50:18 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-14 13:32:41 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 04:05:39 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 04:22:14 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 04:32:47 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 13:33:32 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-14 14:55:38 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-14 17:03:24 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
"Phil Roberts, Jr.&q  2007-11-14 19:12:00 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-15 03:34:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 18:37:35 PST 2009.