On Nov 14, 3:43 pm, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Are you saying that situations have no part in
> human choices.
I am saying socialism is a scourge and requires man to contradict his
nature, I am saying man contradicts his nature at his peril and that's
why socialism is a such a ****ing scourge and doesn't result in man
living, staying alive but not living.
YOU give YOUR life its meaning not me.
> Social
> scientists often talk......
Who but a ****ing retard like chazzz and Timmm and Bwet etal would
give a **** what they do?
> What is this freedom,
In the political / moral sense? being free from the INITIATION of
physical force, being left alone, leaving others alone, asking nicely,
saying thankyou, not forcing, YOU keeping, YOU chosing, you know, all
of the values and virtues totally opposite to socialism, why do you
ask, all of the ides which render socialism totally and utterly
impotent.
> is it caused by dispositions
Its caused by nice and peaceful humans acting according to their own
nature, e.g. is it in your nature to force other nice and peaceful
human beings to conform to your values? It is? That'd mean you're
****.
> If it cannot act in contradiction to its nature how would you show
> this since it would never have been observed?
That's right, reality is real, by definition contradictions dont
exist. So when you do come accross one then you know its not real, and
you know its been invented by a dopey ****ing human being, they're
like gods, man made.
> Are those choices caused or determined?
I choose the flavour ice-cream, your question is typically Kantian and
mystical, totally lacking in context.
MG
|
