Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy of free will

On Nov 13, 4:41 pm, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> When you said;
>
> Irresponsibility is created as responsibility is
> removed.

I was of course referring to the dopey evil anti-human socialist's
idea of removing the individual from the responsibility of providing
for himself and thereby creating irresponsible human individuals.

> the laws that protect individual right should
> still be enforced.

Upheld not enforced there's a HUGE difference.

In reality man's freedom is his natural state and therefore can only
be violated.

The s***bag claiming to be granting man his freedom is the same
s***bag desiring to violate it.

An entity can not act in contradiction of its nature.

When man does, and that's because he has an ability to choose and
because he has no automatic means of survival, then if he acts in
contradiction of his nature, then it will be at his peril, e.g.
witness the parasitical masochistical scourge of socialism as more and
more human individual responsibility is removed.


Michael Gordge