Talk About Network

Google





Professions > Philosophy Kant > Re: Unusual lin...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 29 of 50 Topic 481 of 533
Post > Topic >>

Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy of free will

by Michael Gordge <mikegordge@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 12, 2007 at 01:07 AM

On Nov 12, 11:37 am, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Steven Pinker - HOW THE MIND WORKS page
54-6http://makeashorterlink.com/?M10722072
>
> As science advances and explanations of behavior become less fanciful,
> the Specter of Creeping Exculpation, as Dennett calls it, will loom
> larger. Without a clearer moral philosophy,

Utter ****ing crap, not worth reading the rest.

What's missing from human behaviour these days is a real and therefore
clear objective standard to judge one's ideas and actions against, its
that simple.

To determine what that standard ought be, one has to first ask, what
are morals, who needs morals, and why do they need them.

The answer is YOU, YOU are the ultimate standard of YOUR own morals /
values, no one else but YOU can be expected to have YOUR morals and
they theirs.


MG
 




 50 Posts in Topic:
Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy of
Scott H <zinites_page@  2007-11-09 11:19:03 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-09 11:39:41 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
"brian fletcher"  2007-11-09 22:47:54 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-09 15:33:58 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Don Stockbauer <donsto  2007-11-09 17:47:10 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-09 20:03:03 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-09 20:11:06 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 20:57:15 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-11 08:57:48 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-09 20:16:10 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-09 20:23:58 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-10 02:27:18 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 09:02:57 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 11:38:32 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Scott H <zinites_page@  2007-11-10 12:24:25 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Scott H <zinites_page@  2007-11-10 12:33:12 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 17:07:16 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-10 14:07:29 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-11 06:47:41 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-11 10:32:38 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-11 18:37:01 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-11 18:40:59 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-11 18:44:50 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 00:41:59 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 00:54:51 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-12 08:19:36 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 01:00:51 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-12 08:07:08 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-12 01:07:34 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 02:44:25 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-12 02:48:50 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-12 02:51:45 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-12 23:41:16 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-13 00:28:50 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-13 00:30:40 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-13 22:43:32 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-14 00:11:18 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-16 09:02:05 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-14 00:12:23 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-14 00:16:19 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
knucmo <stevejouanny@[  2007-11-14 03:50:18 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-14 13:32:41 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 04:05:39 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 04:22:14 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 04:32:47 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 13:33:32 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-14 14:55:38 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-14 17:03:24 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
"Phil Roberts, Jr.&q  2007-11-14 19:12:00 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-15 03:34:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 18:43:45 PST 2009.