Talk About Network

Google





Professions > Philosophy Kant > Re: Unusual lin...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 50 Topic 481 of 533
Post > Topic >>

Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy of free will

by Michael Gordge <mikegordge@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 9, 2007 at 03:33 PM

On Nov 10, 4:19 am, Scott H <zinites_p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In response to determinism, Kant explains how the antinomy of free
> will arises from a misuse of reason:

There's your problem there, you believe that Kant was trying to solve
a problem, when in reality he was creating one from a faulty premise.

There is matter and each entity of matter has a nature, the nature of
an entity of matter is included in its identity, each entity of matter
acts according to its nature, an entity of matter can not act in
contradiction of its nature.

"Free will" is a man made concept, entities of matter act according to
their nature, they dont have a choice, thats the simple beginning and
the end of the story of matter.

NOTE man's choice is a Clayton's choice, he acts in contradiction of
his nature at his peril e.g. as socialism is a testimony to.


Michael Gordge
 




 50 Posts in Topic:
Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy of
Scott H <zinites_page@  2007-11-09 11:19:03 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-09 11:39:41 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
"brian fletcher"  2007-11-09 22:47:54 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-09 15:33:58 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Don Stockbauer <donsto  2007-11-09 17:47:10 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-09 20:03:03 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-09 20:11:06 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 20:57:15 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-11 08:57:48 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-09 20:16:10 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-09 20:23:58 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-10 02:27:18 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 09:02:57 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 11:38:32 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Scott H <zinites_page@  2007-11-10 12:24:25 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Scott H <zinites_page@  2007-11-10 12:33:12 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-10 17:07:16 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-10 14:07:29 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-11 06:47:41 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-11 10:32:38 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-11 18:37:01 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-11 18:40:59 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-11 18:44:50 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 00:41:59 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 00:54:51 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-12 08:19:36 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 01:00:51 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-12 08:07:08 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-12 01:07:34 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-12 02:44:25 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-12 02:48:50 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-12 02:51:45 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-12 23:41:16 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-13 00:28:50 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-13 00:30:40 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-11-13 22:43:32 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-14 00:11:18 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-16 09:02:05 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-14 00:12:23 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-11-14 00:16:19 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
knucmo <stevejouanny@[  2007-11-14 03:50:18 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-14 13:32:41 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 04:05:39 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 04:22:14 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 04:32:47 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-11-14 13:33:32 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
John Jones <jonescardi  2007-11-14 14:55:38 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-14 17:03:24 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
"Phil Roberts, Jr.&q  2007-11-14 19:12:00 
Re: Unusual line of reasoning in Kant's response to the antinomy
Malrassic Park <maleno  2007-11-15 03:34:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 18:07:27 PST 2009.