"Michael Gordge" <mikegordge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1189980503.937169.87200@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sep 16, 10:47 pm, "brian fletcher" <brian...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Of course. Being "mystic" (as opposed to "a" mystic...mystics tend not
to
>> catagorise others),
>
> Oh rubbish chazzz does it all the time, you cant be a socialist
> without holding and embracing mytsical ideas.
>
>> involves actually finding that there are answers and
>> solutions and how they are discovered.
>
> Yeah but when the questions are mystical, then how do they know what
> to look for in the answers and where the heck are they going to find
> them?
A question is a question, and it is also a 'window' into the state of
awareness of the individual.
>
> A mystic looking towards more mystisim aint gonna solve any problem
There are no problems, so your argument fails.
> Brian, he adds to his problem, indeed look how deap in **** chazzz
> izzz.
No reason to.
Are you comparing ?
>
>> Accomplished individuals will show you how to find the answers.
>
> Nope, they will show you HOW to ask questions and HOW to judge the
> answers.
Care to explain how you show someone how to ask questions, and then how to
judge the answers?
BOfL
>
> MG
>
|
