Talk About Network

Google





Professions > Philosophy Kant > Re: Not Knowing...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 471 of 533
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not Knowing A Thing In Itself = Typical Contradicting Kantian Stupidity.

by "brian fletcher" <brianf88@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 14, 2007 at 03:53 PM

"Michael Gordge" <mikegordge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:1189757866.927064.153070@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sep 14, 4:41 pm, "brian fletcher" <brian...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Senses are not reality.
>
> Tried to feel anything with frozen hands?

Exactly my point. You are so obsessed with Kant, you cant even see when 
someone agrees with your point. You are rekanting what you see with frozen

eyes.
>
>> Because something makes sense yesterday, doesnt mean
>> it will tomorrow.
>
> Shrug, meaningless piffle, what you learn know or do tomorrow cant
> change what you know do or did today.

Of course, but thats got nothing to do with what I said.

BOfL



>
> MG
>
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not Knowing A Thing In Itself = Typical Contradicting Kantia
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-14 01:17:46 
Re: Not Knowing A Thing In Itself = Typical Contradicting Kantia
"brian fletcher"  2007-09-14 15:53:02 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 17:41:53 PST 2009.