Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Professions > Philosophy Kant > Re: Not Knowing...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 470 of 526
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not Knowing A Thing In Itself = Typical Contradicting Kantian Stupidity.

by Michael Gordge <mikegordge@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 13, 2007 at 11:42 PM

On Sep 14, 1:15 pm, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> By means of outer sense, a property of our mind, we represent to
> ourselves objects as outside us, and all without exception in space.

And in the past when I have asked you to give the
meaning of the concept space, you said it was "a theory"

sooooo you're saying

"we represent to ourselves objects as outside us,
and all without exception in a theory".

So why did you use the concept "sense" if its all just theory
in theory anyway?

Soooo in this theory of yours that its all theory, then
you never know when your theory becomes
fact and even thats only a theory and not a fact, because
its only a theory anyway and that might even be a fact
but you wont ever know, because that would require you to
accept something as a fact when its all only theory? Poor sod


MG
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not Knowing A Thing In Itself = Typical Contradicting Kantia
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-13 23:42:42 
Re: Not Knowing A Thing In Itself = Typical Contradicting Kantia
"brian fletcher"  2007-09-14 07:41:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 11:34:29 CST 2008.