Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Professions > Philosophy Kant > Re: Not Knowing...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 469 of 526
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not Knowing A Thing In Itself = Typical Contradicting Kantian Stupidity.

by Michael Gordge <mikegordge@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 13, 2007 at 10:07 PM

On Sep 14, 1:15 pm, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
> By means of outer sense, a property of our mind,

Oh so your eyes are only painted on and dont
send signals to the brain, but rather the brain sends signals
to the eyes telling them that what the saw, they didnt actually
see until the brain says they do?
The brain just guesses when to instruct the eyes what
they're not really seeing?

Hmmmmmm have you run this idea past your optometrist?

> we represent to
> ourselves objects as outside us,

Really? you're making this up aren't you?
this is just another of your theories
based on a theory about a theory isn't it?
Are they the same objects that you eyes dont see
until the brain instructs them that have seen an object?

> and all without exception in space.

WOW and soooooooo?

MG
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not Knowing A Thing In Itself = Typical Contradicting Kantia
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-13 22:07:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 12:39:40 CST 2008.