On Sep 11, 5:08 am, 1Z <peterdjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 10 Sep, 09:15, chazwin <chazwy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > That you have cognition means that all objects are perceived as
> > concepts. You do not perceive an object but a concept in which your
> > experience of the "thing-in-itself" resides.
>
> Echhh. That is not at all what Kant means by "concept"
You Kantians are sooo funny to read, fancy not being able to agree on
what Kant means about anything. That just shows how multi-meaning,
therefore deliberately ambiguous and dishonest, all of his dopey ideas
are.
Kant not only steals concepts, like knowledge, and totally changes the
meaning of it, or more correctly speaking, he just gives it another
meaning, to suit his own dopey epistemology, he then finds, like all
dishonest people do, that he has to invent another lie to cover the
first lie, and in this case he steals the concept concept and gives it
a brand new meaning, that can be found no-where but inside another
Kantian's head, as 1Z has just confirmed and yet chazzzzz has just
rejected, bizarre.
Michael Gordge
|
