Re: Kant on things in themselves

On Sep 11, 3:37 am, chazwin <chazwy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
> Yes Scott I can tell you that this is what he thinks he thinks, but he
> is mistaken.
> He lacks the vision to see the plain evidence before his eyes.

Christolmighty how much more desperate can ewe get chazzz? You
emphatically condemn capitalism, even though your life depends upon it
and and even though you pratice it yourself.

You laud the anti-human s*** Castro as a ****ing hero, you promote
parasitical evil socialist ideology.

You embrace the oxymoronic piffle of a total fruit cake, Kant, you
constantly accuse me of ****ing sheep, you have called me a ****ing
idiot because I endorse and promote the politcally moral ethical idea
of capitaliam, which is based upon nothing more simple to explain than
peaceful non-threatening humans beings being left free and alone to
trade goods and servivces with each other and with who they choose,
meaning, human beings having the freedom, for both parties to the
trade, to perceive a greater for lesser value in their trade with each
other. e.g. even dishonest totally ****ed in the head socialist
frutcakes like you chazzzz, have been known to shop around, e.e. ACT
LIKE A CAPITALIST, in shopping for a bargain.


Michael Gordge