Talk About Network

Google





Professions > Philosophy Kant > Re: Kant on thi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 25 Topic 467 of 533
Post > Topic >>

Re: Kant on things in themselves

by Michael Gordge <mikegordge@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 10, 2007 at 01:32 AM

On Sep 10, 12:08 pm, Scott H <zinites_p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Everyone is free to debate about this, but I won't discuss it with
> Michael Gordge if he chooses to use personal attacks.

I dont Scott, I never have Scott, I never would Scott, I identify
things as they exist e.g. I would NEVER identify someone a ****ing
useless, queer, knuckle-dragging commie Castro arse kissing ****,
unless all of the evidence points to them being exactly that, ask
chazzzzzz if you dont believe me.

I would never get so desperate to call someone a sheep ****er,
especially I would never do it in public hiding behind an unethical
****ing cowardly stage name, I have never and I would never wish a
poster's wife cancer, I have never and I would never threaten to smash
someone's head in, I have never and I would never write anything at a
public forum about anyone unless the evidence points to it, nor do I
without providing my name.

I treat nice people nicely and I do not owe civility to my enemy, nor
to horrid human s*** e.g. socialists, commies, fascists, so if the cap
fits Scottt then wear it and go **** yourself.

Oh and how ****ing dare you start a thread with a stupid unjustified
attempt to try and control the way I speak and deal with ****ing
s***.

I dont give two ****s that you dont have the ****ing courage of your
cowardly Kantian queeer and stupid irrational contradicting
convictions Scott, when you write your crap here then I will hold you
responsible with the use of my words, you got that?

> Kant gives us an example in an attempt to illustrate how we cannot
> know things in themselves.

That statement now exists as "a thing" in itself, therefore applied to
itself, it is statement that cant be known in itself, can you work out
why?

Kant steals concepts, he wants and needs "things" to have more than
one meaning, he steals concepts and gives them his very own invented
stupid meaning to suit his dopey epistemology.

> First of all, I consider three lines to be objects, not concepts.

Then define them, but you'll have to pretend you're not talking to me.


Michael Gordge
 




 25 Posts in Topic:
Kant on things in themselves
Scott H <zinites_page@  2007-09-09 20:08:39 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
"brian fletcher"  2007-09-10 03:34:09 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
malenoid@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-09-09 20:42:27 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-09-09 20:55:09 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
malenoid@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-09-09 21:32:26 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-09-10 01:15:42 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-10 01:32:47 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-10 02:12:10 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
D H <wings4us@[EMAIL P  2007-09-10 08:58:44 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-09-10 11:32:00 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-09-10 11:37:14 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
1Z <peterdjones@[EMAIL  2007-09-10 13:08:50 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-10 14:06:40 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-10 14:30:05 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-10 14:48:21 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
chazwin <chazwyman@[EM  2007-09-10 16:35:10 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Immortalist <reanimate  2007-09-10 20:22:53 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Malrassic Park <Maleno  2007-09-10 21:58:54 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
1Z <peterdjones@[EMAIL  2007-09-11 02:48:59 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-11 03:05:09 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Errol <vs.errol@[EMAIL  2007-09-11 05:59:32 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
D H <wings4us@[EMAIL P  2007-09-11 09:16:22 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-11 13:44:04 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Errol <vs.errol@[EMAIL  2007-09-12 02:59:47 
Re: Kant on things in themselves
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-12 03:42:00 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 18:49:36 PST 2009.