Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Professions > Philosophy Kant > Re: Not Knowing...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 463 of 526
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not Knowing A Thing In Itself = Typical Contradicting Kantian Stupidity.

by Michael Gordge <mikegordge@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 6, 2007 at 02:02 PM

On Sep 7, 3:47 am, D H <wings...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> brian fletcher wrote:

> Certainty concerning metaphysical "things-in-themselves" doesn't even
> matter.

The Kantian nightmare is dead without it, so the "things-in-
themselves" BS matters everything to be Kantian.

> What's im****tant is that we have or can come to a conceptual concensus
> about "things-for-us" in our shared, phenomenal world.

You're being just be as slly as any Kantian could ever dream to be
now. FFS consensus aint gonna stop the sun from ****ning nor stop the
bus from running you over.

When consensus, which can only apply among man, is the only thing
keeping you alive as you appear to be saying, then consensus has
become your biggest threat and your worst enemy.

You seem wi****ng a middle ground between faith and reason, where there
aint one, su****ne.

A zillion humans having a consensus aint gonna stop a tree being what
it is.

There was a consensus in Nazi Germany and of course among Kantians and
mystics.

Logic, in the context of reason as man's only means to hs knowledge,
logic means nothing more than, non-contradictory identification and
integration.


Michael Gordge
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not Knowing A Thing In Itself = Typical Contradicting Kantia
Michael Gordge <mikego  2007-09-06 14:02:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 12:36:21 CST 2008.