On Aug 13, 11:43 am, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> Inductive reasoning has this non-contradictory nature in relation to
> the past, but once you propose that this non-contradictory reasoning
> extends across all time including the future,
The future by definition never arrives Mortal, sort out your
definitions / identity of your concepts.
The best you can ever do, with the concept man has called the future,
is to make predictions based on the exact continuation of current
situation/s and man's current knowledge.
Your knowledge can only be of the now and past, based on the currently
known and available and previous evidence and experience.
All of man's knowledge is contextual and hierarchical.
There is absolute 100% certain evidence that man can make extremely
accurate predictions, life saving and life enhancing predictions, but
those predictions are always contingent because the future by
definition never arrives, man deals with and lives in the now now now
now using the current and past data.
The only people who claim or might claim a definite future are the
mystics and or the Kantians who cant even claim they are the real and
absolute representations of the outside world to other humans.
Michael Gordge


|