"Neil W Rickert" <rickert+nn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:yi5Uk.8809$ZP4.4922@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Isaac" <groups@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
>>Neil, I sent it to you email listed.
>
> Thanks. Copy received, and appreciated.
>
>> I replaced the "+" with "."
assuming
>>that was an anti-SPAM measure.
>
> That was a mistake, and probably gave you a bounce. The "+"
> was correct. But fortunately you included both addresses, so
> the one with the "+" got through. (If you had removed the "+"
> and what follows it up to the "@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
", that would have worked to.
> The "+string" is to allow me to sort it into a different mailbox.
> And yes, that different mailbox does get extra anti-spam treatment.
>
I figured there was a chance it could be legit so I did both. Glad it
reached you.
> It's a bit long, so it might be a day or two before I have a comment.
If time is at a premium you may want to just focus on the sections that I
post critiques on. I plan on doing it in sequential order with the paper
so
that might be more efficient for you.
> But it is rather interesting, and more interesting than some of
> Dreyfus's previous articles on AI.
He is always trying to bridge classic philosophy with technology to make
broad conclusions about AI. I think this time he is trying to rely on
cognitive neuroscience research (esp. in re to chaos and neural networks)
to
buttress his long standing positions. However, I think he over reaches
their because he does not understand anything about the technical issues,
which imo greatly weakens, if not eviscerates his conclusions.
>I will probably be disagreeing
> with Dreyfus
On an AI news group, this is what I expect, of course.
>and possibly with you too.
Yes, I am counting on this being the case. You have two birds to shoot
down
possibly with completely different ammunition. I am always very
controversial so it will be very easy for you to disagree with both Dryfus
and my comments.
>But then I have my own
> unique way of looking at questions of cognition.
Vive la differance!
I look forward to your well reasoned feedback on my critiques that I post
that you find interesting to respond to .
Ariel B.-
>
|
