in a world of termoil which is densly populated, many disturbing and quite
possibly even harrowing incidents may happen, in the midst of our cities
or
in the more peripheral parts of our countries, but in case such incidents
are immedeately followed by acts of conquest, like a military invasion,
the
chances that we are in fact dealing with what is commonly known as a
border
incident, which would have been staged to commonly explain or legitimate
an
otherwise suspicious or unlawful act of aggression, increase
exponentially.
currently only one force on the planet is both capable and structurally
engaged in the military follow-up of incidents and this is NATO. I cannot
say authorized, since there isn't any higher authority around that could
issue such an authority, or it would have to be the voting public, which
again is led by the occurrence of border incidents, the alternate
explanation of which in isolated cases is even made a criminal offense,
which would make the authorization circular.
to deal with the inherent doubt as to the authenticity of border
incidents,
in case they would have to stand as historical junctures, basicly to
prevent
the repeated occurrence of the incidents from becoming a circus of
ridicule,
which might render control over the public insufficient, they would have
to
be staged in an ever more grandioso fa****on.
most people would consider building hundreds of 300 or more meter tall and
narrow structures in a relatively confined area asking for trouble. so if
you care to involve aeroplanes in the actual event of the disaster it
would
be interesting, but by no means necessary as an explanation.
of course the holocaust rendered europe for ever incapable of handling its
own sovereignty, and it was consequently occupied by russian and american
troops for decades, only to retreat when main forces entered the continent
from the south, which had been making futile attemts to that effect for
many
centuries, with the unequivocal intent of completely eradicating its prior
civilization.
this would make the discovery of the holocaust THE historical juncture of
european civilization, and as such a very like candidate for a border
incident. the only rub is that it actually happened. at least it did by
law.
neighbouring inhabitants of camps were quite unfamiliar with the goings-on
inside them, that is until they were confronted with cinematographic
footage
made by russian and american troops, which were also on film.
so some doubt would have to be reserved, not least if we consider the
secondary evidence presented by the historical context of the discovery,
or
simply the wonderful things the hollywood trade has brought to mankind in
recent decades, and how they relate to reality.
so while watching the supermarionatic efforts of yet another airborn
astronaut, the question arbitrarily came to mind if the use of border
incidents prior to military engagement is something ideosyncratic, perhaps
ritual, or in fact something quite delusional, because the way I see it
there isn't a live individual on the planet who gives but the slightest
credence to any of them, whether annual celebrations of the junctures be
held in america, europe or elsewhere on the planet.
or shouldn't I be in any way worried?
|
