Balham Hill Post Office (14/Nov/2002)
Certainty level: 80%
By mid-November 2002 the persecution had again dwindled, as happens
sometimes, when along came this item.
I spent most of my time at home, going occasionally to the shops in
Clapham South, or into town to meet people. On this particular
Thursday I only left the house once, for less than fifteen minutes to post
a letter (special delivery, because my ordinary and
recorded delivery letters had been disappearing en route for some time -
not that anyone would accuse MI5 of such petty harassment).
At the post office counter there was an Asian guy talking into his mobile
phone and grinning away. There is a probability that
his comments were directed at me, as I will explain further. The second
segment of audio closely follows the first segment.
"you'll do it today? let's meet about 3 o'clock and have some lunch. I got
stuff to do and I'll go to the bank,
get this sh.. ****ing moving yeah. Even just a little bit do something. He
doesn't understand, you know what it is,
I don't want to tell him again cause then he might, he thinks we're having
a go at him, I'm not having a go at him,
I'm explain to him"
Explanation: The guy is talking about some bloke who is unnamed, however
it might be interpreted as being in code about me.
"I'll go to the bank"... variously interpretable, either literally, or as
sounds-like "wank" which has been a consistent
theme in MI5's abuse. "get this **** ****ing moving"... abuse... could be
interpreted as MI5's criticism of my inertness.
The state spends hundreds of thousands of pounds a year - they want to see
some result, not just neutrality and ordinariness.
"he doesn't understand"... MI5 claim I'm stupid... but the numbers and
bits of paper prove otherwise, so perhaps what that
is really about is their agents' subconscious perception of themselves.
"having a go at him"... sounds like they're having a go at me, doesn't it?
You might take the audio at face value and assume
it's about some other guy, but it's normal MI5 procedure to pretend to be
talking about someone else, and make the content of
the message very relevant to me, or their perception of me.
"for some reason it doesn't get into his head, I don't know why... he's
lost it completely, hasn't he"
What reason is there for it not getting into his (my) head? Stupidity is
implied. Also implied is that it does get into his head;
we're intentionally causing him damage. He's lost it completely... for
some time I have suffered from OCD... lost it completely
is the persecutors' observation of my illness, which they see through the
surveillance on my home, which they caused.
24205
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|
