Re: Race vs. Homo***uality: One You Are Born With, The Other Is An Action

On 2008-11-17 10:37:19 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:

> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:58:30 -0600, Boston Blackie <bblackie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>> On 2008-11-17 07:59:01 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
said:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:44:49 -0600, Mike Smith <mws@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> On 16 Nov 2008 07:17:16 GMT, The Chief Instigator <patrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:37:50 -0800 (PST), Tracey-Rush-Savage-Hannity
>>>>> <tracey12_12@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> On Nov 15, 5:54 am, Boston Blackie <bblac...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2008-11-14 04:18:17 -0600, Tracey-Rush-Savage-Hannity
>>>>>>> <tracey12...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> How can we compared a race and the rights we give those of a race
vs.
>>>>>>>> an action which any two same *** people can engage in whether
they are
>>>>>>>> actually gay or not?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Equality for an action?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Should any 3 people be recognized as equal to hetero***ual
couples?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Should 6 people who want to marry each other?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Why do you care?
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> "I've always felt that a person's intelligence is directly
reflected by
>>>>>>> the number of conflicting points of view he can entertain
>>>>>>> simultaneously on the same topic."
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Abigail Adams.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> WHY DO HOMO***UALS CARE ABOUT GETTING MARRIED AND BEING RECOGNIZED
BY
>>>>>> THE GOVERNMENT AS SOME KIND OF MINORITY TO BE GIVEN SPECIAL RIGHTS?
>>>>> 
>>>>> What special rights?  They're asking for equal rights:  straights
can marry
>>>>> the non-related consenting adult of their choice, while homo***uals
can't.
>>>> 
>>>> Are you intentionally lying or are you just ignorant?
>>> 
>>> Maybe you should ask that of yourself.  Prop 8 is likely going to be
swatted
>>> down after the precedent set by Loving.  You're advocating unequal
rights,
>>> which is not what the Constitution prescribes.
>>> 
>>>> Normal people can marry the non-related consenting adult of their
choice
>>>> as long as that adult is a member of the opposite ***. That is the
>>>> qualification for marriage. In that respect, homos do have equal
rights.
>>> 
>>> So why is it such a threat to you?  It hasn't devalued (or otherwise
>>> adversely affected) my marriage.
>> 
>> It ruined Rush's last three marriages!
> 
> That, and the oxycontin...

and the sleeping with boys in the Dominican Republic
-- 
http://tinyurl.com/6xkfmc
 http://tinyurl.com/5k2mj7

http://tinyurl.com/5qs2kq