Re: Race vs. Homo***uality: One You Are Born With, The Other Is An Action

On 2008-11-17 07:59:01 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:

> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:44:49 -0600, Mike Smith <mws@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On 16 Nov 2008 07:17:16 GMT, The Chief Instigator <patrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:37:50 -0800 (PST), Tracey-Rush-Savage-Hannity 
>>> <tracey12_12@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> On Nov 15, 5:54 am, Boston Blackie <bblac...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> On 2008-11-14 04:18:17 -0600, Tracey-Rush-Savage-Hannity
>>>>> <tracey12...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> How can we compared a race and the rights we give those of a race
vs.
>>>>>> an action which any two same *** people can engage in whether they
are
>>>>>> actually gay or not?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Equality for an action?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Should any 3 people be recognized as equal to hetero***ual couples?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Should 6 people who want to marry each other?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why do you care?
>>>>> --
>>>>> "I've always felt that a person's intelligence is directly reflected
by
>>>>> the number of conflicting points of view he can entertain
>>>>> simultaneously on the same topic."
>>>>> 
>>>>> Abigail Adams.
>>>> 
>>>> WHY DO HOMO***UALS CARE ABOUT GETTING MARRIED AND BEING RECOGNIZED BY
>>>> THE GOVERNMENT AS SOME KIND OF MINORITY TO BE GIVEN SPECIAL RIGHTS?
>>> 
>>> What special rights?  They're asking for equal rights:  straights can
marry
>>> the non-related consenting adult of their choice, while homo***uals
can't.
>> 
>> Are you intentionally lying or are you just ignorant?
> 
> Maybe you should ask that of yourself.  Prop 8 is likely going to be
swatted
> down after the precedent set by Loving.  You're advocating unequal
rights,
> which is not what the Constitution prescribes.
> 
>> Normal people can marry the non-related consenting adult of their
choice
>> as long as that adult is a member of the opposite ***. That is the
>> qualification for marriage. In that respect, homos do have equal
rights.
> 
> So why is it such a threat to you?  It hasn't devalued (or otherwise
> adversely affected) my marriage.

It ruined Rush's last three marriages!
-- 
http://tinyurl.com/6xkfmc
 http://tinyurl.com/5k2mj7

http://tinyurl.com/5qs2kq