Re: MADD is at it again

Brent P <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
news:ypWdnZokPI42mHHVnZ2dnUVZ_hGdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/25/2557.asp
> 
> MADD is doing their usual bit with regard to checkpoints, interlocks,
> and so on. This time in Texas. 
> 
> Interesting fact: 
> 
> "In a 2005 decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that 99.29
> percent of drivers stopped at state roadblocks were innocent. The
> results also showed that it took 53 percent more effort to make an
> arrest with a roadblock than to use traditional roving patrol
> techniques."
> 
> Yet, the federal government uses the gasoline tax money that is supposed
> to be used to fix bridges and such to have local PDs run checkpoints.
> Maybe the checkpoints offer something that old fa****on patrols that
> would put safety first don't. Nahh it couldn't have anything to do with
> puncturing another hole in our rights.... that would be tin foil
> hattery! 
> 
> 
> 

As i've said  many times, one of the best ways to combat drunk driving is 
to make it a felony.  Knowing they will lose their right to have guns will

make these redneck drunk drivers think twice.