Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Professions > Law-enforcement Traffic > Question on cal...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 3148 of 3194
Post > Topic >>

Question on calling witnesses

by Fenton <no-spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 9, 2008 at 04:27 PM

This is a no-injury, no-crash DUI case.  DL = defense lawyer; PA = 
prosecuting attny

Say that a phone call was made from Bob to Larry and the nature of the
phone 
call is im****tant. Not what was said, but that the call was made.  Bob is 
willing to testify. Defendant wants to keep Larry out of it. Neither Bob
nor 
Larry are witness to the reason the case is in court and neither are in
any 
kind of trouble. Larry just doesn't want to get involved. Defendant
respects 
that and is willing to ****eld Larry. 

So assume that defendant tells DL, "Bob called Larry at midnight."
Defendant 
says let's go to trial. 

My question is this: What does the PA have a right to get from DL?  PA has
a 
right to a list of witnesses, so does DL have to reveal that Bob called 
Larry?  Does DL just give PA Bob's name, but not the reason?  If so, then
I 
assume PA can talk to Bob before the trial. 

I'm thinking Bob and defendant should just say, "Bob called someone and
we're 
not telling you who."
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Question on calling witnesses
Fenton <no-spam@[EMAIL  2008-08-09 16:27:56 
Re: Question on calling witnesses
"Al" <al_nev  2008-08-19 05:07:23 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 1:43:13 CST 2008.