<tedqn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:37340245-bd2a-485b-a23a-7fd7e6895e83@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm considering switching insurance agent but just want to make sure I
> don't accidentally misjudge him.
>
> Long story but I'll try to make it as short as possible:
> - Traffic cam caught vehicle running red light.
> - Ticket issued automatically by retrieving driver license # from DMV
> based on vehicle license plate #.
A good reason why you should never register the vehicle
you primarily drive in your personal name.
> DMV system messed up and assigned my
> driver license to the ticket because the actual vehicle owner has the
> same name.
> - DMV system also messed up somehow and assigned an invalid address to
> my record as "Other". Ticket sent there and I never received.
So no valid service.
> - Driver license suspended without me knowing about
Not because of the un-received, photo-ticket.
Many states have rules requiring valid personal service
before any photo-radar/light ticket to be valid. Mail
doesn't cut it. Furthermore many states do NOT count
photo-radar/light tickets against the Driver License
*even if* the defendant is found guilty or pleads guilty.
> it untill
> insurance company did a checkup on renewal. It took me a great deal of
> effort to track down what it's about and got the court to dismiss the
> ticket as mistake.
And you have a copy of the court order, right?
> - My DMV printout shows all those actions "ticketed date, suspended
> date due to failure to appear, unsuspended date, ect"
What State are you referring to?
> - Insurance bases on that and deny me of good driver discount. I'm
> still working with the DMV investigator who worked on my case
> initially when I filed an investigation re****t (thought someone
> fraudulently put a vehicle under my name) to see if he can get those
> entries removed from my record.
You said the court dismissed the original case. That should
be reflected in the DMV record, that the underlying ticket/offense
was dismissed.
> - I've explainded to my insurance agent but he just says "it shows on
> your record therefore they deny you ..." and that's it.
What did you expect him to say/do? Believe every liar
on the planet who tries to deny their DMV record?
> I don't know
> whether there's nothing an insurance agent can do or maybe he's just
> not competant enough.
What, exactly, do *you* think he could do?
> I'm the one who has to figure out the whole
> thing since the start while he didn't contribute any useful advice at
> all.
Here's a hint -- He's NOT your LAWYER, moron.
>
|
