On Feb 22, 9:31 pm, "Mr A Clarke" <aclarke2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> <gdewi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:360de141-cc81-436c-8a57-7141e6d1c556@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> >http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/gaby-de-wilde-perpetual-motion.gif
> > [see illustration]
>
> > The top magnet inducts a field into the strip. The strip then repels
> > the magnet below it.
>
> > Thus the strip is lifted as a result of the magnet above it but it's
> > loss in weight is not suspended from it.
>
> > The more magnetic flux we pump into a ferromagnetic object the more it
> > will repel and attract other magnetic objects.
>
> > The strip as illustrated is lifted only partially as a result of the
> > attraction. The majority of it's lift is caused by the magnet
> > underneath it.
>
> > no really!
>
> >http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=750
> > View topic - Perpetual motion made simple.
>
> > backup images:
>
>http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/3-point-interaction/combination-of-nega...
> >http://img70.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gabydewildeperpetualmotgt0.gif
>
>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v338/Enkhuizen/gaby-de-wilde-perpet...
>
> > regards,
>
> > gaby de wilde
>
> Have you taken into account "Magnetic Drag",
Hello Mr Clarke,
Yes, In fact this drag is of no relevance in this system until you
wind a coil around the iron profile. then it's wobble becomes
something awfully interesting.
The main goal is lifting heavy objects of course (moving pistons)
> imposed by the physical law
Ah, yes the imposed laws of physics. I have taken the imposter's into
account, this is why I'm making backups and posts everywhere.
>whereby the ferrous matrix aligns in opposition to the motion of the
magnet to it?
The matrix was already aligned. It is merely amplified.
> Not so simple!
Yours is more complicated?
:-)
