Martin wrote:
> Shrike wrote:
>> Budikka666 wrote:
>>> http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2008/05/in-the-light-of-1.html
>>> "Robert Hazen explains the various steps necessary for the origin of
>>> life and defines complexity and shows how complexity can increase"
>>>
>>> Budikka
>> He can explain anything until he goes blue in the face. If you can't
>> duplicate abiogenesis. Then it is not a fact.
>
> It's hard work with the mentally challanged.
>
> Unless you believe either the earth has always existed and life has
> always existed on earth then abiogenesis is a fact. There was no life
> and now there is, what do you think the move from one to the other is
> called?
Don't know, and neither do you. At one point there was no empire state
building in New York City, now there is How did it get there?