Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Professions > Biology > Re: Evolution t...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1052 of 1103
Post > Topic >>

Re: Evolution tested?

by =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=A7=F1=FChw=A4=A3f?= <snuhwolf@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 14, 2008 at 08:09 AM

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:25:28 GMT
Baboon Adamo <evolvedgrandson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> =A7=F1=FChw=A4=A3f wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:47:45 GMT
> > Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >=20
> >> Killiam wrote:
> >>> TimK wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Evolution, despite the ignorant rantings of people like you, is
test=
ed=20
> >>>> - for well over 100 years.
> >>> How?
> >>> With old incomplete bones?
> >> Why do you think the fact of evolution rests in old bones?
> >=20
> > Explain drug resistant bacteria.
> >=20
> > CASE CLOSED.
> >=20
> > --
> >
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/13/i-dont-even-know-who-petraeus-and-c=
rocker-are/
>=20
> Bacteria are still bacteria.

Failure to parse scalable example of evolution noted.

--
http://www.alternet.org/workplace/81919/
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Evolution tested?
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=A7=F1=FCh  2008-04-14 08:09:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 6:08:56 CST 2008.