On Apr 12, 6:54 pm, Kathy C <kokusmaxi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Uncle Vic wrote:
> > One fine day in alt.atheism, Kathy C <kokusmaxi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> TimK wrote:
> >>> "Killiam" <koof...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>>news:_47Mj.815$mG1.159@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> TimK wrote:
>
> >>>>> Evolution, despite the ignorant rantings of people like you, is
> >>>>> tested - for well over 100 years.
> >>>> How?
> >>>> With old incomplete bones?
> >>> Evolution is about genetics.
> >>> idiot
>
> >> Yeah of course. there was this thread about the evolution of bats. I
> >> guess you missed that one.
>
> >> in the short, Bat been around for millions of year with very little
> >> change versus Hominid. Why don't bats evolve.
>
> > Probably because their habitat (dark caves) and food source have not
> > changed much. Genetic mutation occurs with changes in habitat, food
> > source, etc., basically survival conditions.
>
> Bats eats insects. Nothing on evolution on insects neither. Why?
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC220_1.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/jan97.html
The fact of evolution is explained by the only scientific answer: the
theory of Evolution. This theory doesn't rest on any one species, but
upon multiple lines of solid scientific evidence.
When the creationists can put up as much evidence for their asinine,
unsup****ted claims as real scientists can sup****tive of the Theory of
Evolution, then, and *only* then, will there be a controversy.
Budikka
|
