JABRIOL Impersonated:
> TimK wrote:
> > "Killiam" <koof...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:_47Mj.815$mG1.159@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> TimK wrote:
>
> >>> Evolution, despite the ignorant rantings of people like you, is
tested -
> >>> for well over 100 years.
> >> How?
> >> With old incomplete bones?
>
> > Evolution is about genetics.
> > idiot
>
> Yeah of course. there was this thread about the evolution of bats. I
> guess you missed that one.
>
> in the short, Bat been around for millions of year with very little
> change versus Hominid. Why don't bats evolve.
Everything living thing we see today has evolved. Every germane
avenue of scientific evidence which has been explored pretty much
demands it.
> Don't know about bats?
Yes we do and their evolution has been in the news recently and not-so-
recently:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathttp://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0127_050127_bats.htmlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4213495.stmhttp://www.newsroom.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/display.cgi?id=444http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2004/11/a_quantum_leap.html
Now where is your evidence that some god made you bats just 6,000
years ago?
> How about the horseshoe crab?
How about it? Where has *any* evolutionist ever said that an organism
*MUST* keep evolving until it becomes a completely different
organism? so-called "fossil" species are not a disproof of
evolution. They're expected by evolutionists.
Now where's *your* evidence that some god gave you crabs just 6,000
years ago?
Maybe you should learn to open your mind before you open your
incredibly stupid, LYING hypocritical cowardly mouth, JABBERWOCKY.
Budikka
