Elmer wrote:
>
> Since evolution is defined as the heritable genetic change in a
> reproducing population over time, and all populations are subject to
> genetic drift even without natural selection:
>
>
http://www.nyu.edu/projects/fitch/courses/evolution/html/genetic_drift.html#GeneticDrift
>
>
> DNA changes.
And yet 55 million, year old bats per the fossil record are about the
same as today. Would you not say they haven't change that much? Are
their genes more resistant to genetic drift than hominids?
