Tiktaalik wrote:
> On Mar 14, 9:41 pm, James Stallion <vio...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Tiktaalik wrote:
>>> On Mar 14, 2:16 pm, "arseman" <72...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wailed:
>>>> "Elmer" <nylic...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:xCuCj.6010$Sa1.3493@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|adman wrote:
>>>> | > "Elmer" <nylic...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> | >news:ceiCj.6111$7d1.5136@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> | > | InterloperV wrote:
>>>> | > | > Paul Hands wrote:
>>>> | > | >
>>>> | > | >>>
>>>> | > | >>> That being said we will know the fools by the ad-hominen
attacks.
>>>> The
>>>> | > | >>> well informed will stick to the subject and ignored the
fools.
>>>> | > | >>
>>>> | > | >> Nonetheless, Hitching is wrong. Evolution just works.
>>>> | > | >
>>>> | > | > Evidence?
>>>> | > |
>>>> | > | Evolution is the heritable genetic change in reproducing
populations
>>>> over
>>>> | > time.
>>>> | > | This is observed. Pick up any decent biology book for more
>>>> information.
>>>> | >
>>>> | > The lack of transitional fossils are evolution's Achilles' heel;
>>>> regardless
>>>> | > of what text books say.
>>>> |
>>>> | Oh good. Please define for us exactly what a transitional fossil
*is*.
>>>> Then
>>>> | we'll go from there.
>>>> I did not expect game playing from you.
>>>> Show a fossil that bridges the gap between the old life form evolving
into
>>>> the new life form.
>>> Archaeopteryx.
>> Scientists call them
"birds"http://www.uky.edu/AS/Geology/webdogs/time/jurassic/jura1.htm
>
> Other scientists call them dinosaurs. Now I wonder why.
>
Not my fault if scientists contradict themselves. So much for scientific
fact.
