Professions > Biology > Re: Abiogeneis ...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

by Valen <Blue@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 12, 2008 at 02:15 AM

Douglas Berry wrote:

> Amino acids are the building blocks of life. And in an experiment that
> duplicated the conditions of the young Earth, we got more than half
> the base acids needed for life in a week.
> 


And how was it determine what atmosphere  a young earth contained? time 
travel?

197 Posts in Topic:

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Valen <Blue@[EMAIL PRO

2008-03-12 02:15:02

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

DanielSan <danielsan19

2008-03-11 19:24:07

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Valen <Blue@[EMAIL PRO

2008-03-12 09:53:18

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-12 03:06:05

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Valen <Blue@[EMAIL PRO

2008-03-12 09:51:50

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-12 13:34:26

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

spyder359 <red@[EMAIL

2008-03-12 21:08:00

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-13 00:22:20

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-12 17:21:32

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-12 21:52:35

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

InterloperV <blue@[EMA

2008-03-13 22:12:44

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-13 22:49:24

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

InterloperV <blue@[EMA

2008-03-13 23:06:13

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-13 23:20:04

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

InterloperV <blue@[EMA

2008-03-13 23:45:25

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-14 00:21:50

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

InterloperV <blue@[EMA

2008-03-14 01:34:33

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-14 02:37:39

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

InterloperV <blue@[EMA

2008-03-14 09:28:02

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-14 11:42:17

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

InterloperV <blue@[EMA

2008-03-14 09:32:29

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-14 12:55:51

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-14 21:27:19

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-14 21:37:52

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-14 21:46:01

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-14 21:49:43

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-14 21:57:44

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-14 23:21:57

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 01:36:31

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 04:21:38

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-14 22:31:48

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 01:56:48

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 12:17:56

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 13:44:52

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 16:06:55

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 18:27:09

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 20:10:51

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 21:07:37

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-16 01:28:49

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 02:51:32

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Karatek <vulcant@[EMAI

2008-03-16 03:02:19

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 03:44:19

Re: Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Ye Old One <usenet@[EM

2008-03-16 11:38:04

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 11:52:52

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-16 12:11:27

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 12:41:40

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 15:18:32

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

walksalone <spamtrap@[

2008-03-16 14:26:55

Re: Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Ye Old One <usenet@[EM

2008-03-15 23:14:57

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-16 01:41:47

Re: Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Ye Old One <usenet@[EM

2008-03-16 11:35:48

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 11:52:09

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-03-16 08:06:14

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 11:49:47

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-03-16 13:14:37

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 12:44:32

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Darrell Stec <darrell_

2008-03-16 09:45:04

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 14:07:42

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Darrell Stec <darrell_

2008-03-16 11:55:03

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-17 09:38:01

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Darrell Stec <darrell_

2008-03-27 22:03:35

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-16 17:24:03

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-03-16 15:13:41

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Hoax <yellow@[EMAIL PR

2008-03-16 14:26:20

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

SeppoP <seppo_pietikai

2008-03-16 16:37:34

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Darrell Stec <darrell_

2008-03-16 11:57:03

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-03-16 15:46:18

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 15:11:52

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-17 09:33:15

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-17 13:06:52

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-17 18:27:57

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-18 00:22:07

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-18 00:29:58

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-18 00:59:13

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-18 01:02:06

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

"Ips-Switch" &l

2008-03-17 20:46:03

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y

2008-03-17 20:41:49

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-03-18 03:18:58

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-15 15:21:49

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 04:18:28

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 12:29:38

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 13:36:31

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 04:16:48

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 12:28:26

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 13:35:16

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 16:03:34

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 18:24:30

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 20:08:34

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 21:01:29

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-16 01:19:39

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 02:48:58

Re: Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Ye Old One <usenet@[EM

2008-03-16 11:53:10

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 01:58:41

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-15 10:36:55

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 12:35:08

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-15 15:24:45

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 02:03:06

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 12:33:33

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-15 15:29:29

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 16:10:47

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-15 19:20:38

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 20:12:33

Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argument,

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-15 20:40:51

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-15 21:18:51

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-16 01:40:30

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 02:55:38

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Karatek <vulcant@[EMAI

2008-03-16 03:05:08

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 03:49:07

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Karatek <vulcant@[EMAI

2008-03-16 11:27:28

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 15:08:50

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

=?windows-1252?Q?=7E_S=E4

2008-03-17 09:32:28

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-16 00:14:25

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Karatek <vulcant@[EMAI

2008-03-16 11:32:54

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

rossum <rossum48@[EMAI

2008-03-16 13:39:15

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 14:03:27

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 15:24:30

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

"M.M. Martinson"

2008-03-16 21:20:15

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-18 00:11:06

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-17 23:10:28

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

rossum <rossum48@[EMAI

2008-03-16 16:31:08

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-17 09:49:20

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Therion Ware <autodele

2008-03-17 09:56:32

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 15:10:05

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-16 17:24:34

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

"M.M. Martinson"

2008-03-16 21:22:20

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-17 05:26:54

Re: Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific ar

Ye Old One <usenet@[EM

2008-03-16 11:44:58

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 11:54:02

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-03-16 13:16:42

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 12:46:54

Fossil Record: the Orce man; what an Ass! yeah the Fossil recor

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 13:30:52

Re: Fossil Record: the Orce man; what an Ass! yeah the Fossil r

Darrell Stec <darrell_

2008-03-16 09:41:20

Re: Fossil Record: the Orce man; what an Ass! yeah the Fossil r

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 14:06:00

Re: Fossil Record: the Orce man; what an Ass! yeah the Fossil r

=?UTF-8?B?fiBTw6RibMOrIH4

2008-03-16 14:48:25

Re: Fossil Record: the Orce man; what an Ass! yeah the Fossil r

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 15:36:53

Re: Fossil Record: the Orce man; what an Ass! yeah the Fossil r

Darrell Stec <darrell_

2008-03-16 11:53:17

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-03-16 15:24:52

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Hoax <yellow@[EMAIL PR

2008-03-16 14:35:22

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-03-16 15:48:01

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

=?windows-1252?Q?=7E_S=E4

2008-03-16 14:59:22

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 15:38:50

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

=?windows-1252?Q?=7E_S=E4

2008-03-17 09:36:21

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-17 07:06:41

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-18 00:21:32

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Evgenij Barsukov <evge

2008-03-17 15:00:33

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Evgenij Barsukov <evge

2008-03-17 15:00:50

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-17 13:07:40

Re: Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific ar

Ye Old One <usenet@[EM

2008-03-17 18:00:01

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-17 17:10:33

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-18 00:39:10

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 15:16:57

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Virgil <Virgil@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 13:08:38

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-18 00:02:46

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

"M.M. Martinson"

2008-03-16 21:25:26

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-15 17:46:14

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-03-16 08:16:49

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Virgil <Virgil@[EMAIL

2008-03-16 13:43:33

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

"Michelle Malkin&quo

2008-03-16 15:58:27

Re: Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific ar

Ye Old One <usenet@[EM

2008-03-16 21:04:22

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-16 21:12:11

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-17 04:59:51

Re: Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific ar

Ye Old One <usenet@[EM

2008-03-17 18:10:48

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Ye Old One <usenet@[EM

2008-03-16 21:07:04

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

"Ips-Switch" &l

2008-03-17 21:08:28

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL

2008-03-17 02:11:15

Re: Abiogeneis a mathemartical miracle?: not a scientific argume

Michael Gray <mikegray

2008-03-17 19:01:12

TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogeneis a

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-18 00:20:30

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-17 23:07:04

Re: TROLL ALERT John Baker another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogeneis

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=7E_S=E4bl

2008-03-18 09:33:35

Re: TROLL ALERT John Baker another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogeneis

John Baker <nunya@[EMA

2008-03-18 05:58:42

Re: TROLL ALERT John Baker another Jabriol sock - criminal Jabs

=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y

2008-03-18 15:08:09

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

Michael Gray <mikegray

2008-03-18 14:30:17

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

=?UTF-8?B?fiBTw6RibMOrIH4

2008-03-18 09:23:01

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Gray

=?UTF-8?B?fiBTw6RibMOrIH4

2008-03-18 15:03:02

TROLL ALERT SABLE IS JABRIOL Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray anoth

Ipw-Switch <Watchtower

2008-03-19 10:00:11

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

Michael Gray <mikegray

2008-03-19 11:29:08

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

Fred Hall <fkhall@[EMA

2008-03-18 21:11:00

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

Michael Gray <mikegray

2008-03-19 14:13:13

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

Ipw-Switch <Watchtower

2008-03-19 10:04:51

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

Fred Hall <fkhall@[EMA

2008-03-19 21:36:07

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

"adman" <725

2008-03-19 07:01:11

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

Fred Hall <fkhall@[EMA

2008-03-19 21:34:52

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock Re: Abiogenei

Darrell Stec <darrell_

2008-03-28 13:01:48

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock? Try Imperson

=?UTF-8?B?fiBTw6RibMOrIH4

2008-03-18 15:14:48

Re: TROLL ALERT Michael Gray another Jabriol sock? Try Imperson

Michael Gray <mikegray

2008-03-19 11:43:05

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-15 20:52:20

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <violet

2008-03-16 01:11:01

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-16 10:05:52

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 11:51:09

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-16 12:14:36

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 12:42:58

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-16 14:05:33

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 14:12:34

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

SeppoP <seppo_pietikai

2008-03-16 15:26:38

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-03-16 14:09:04

Re: Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

Ye Old One <usenet@[EM

2008-03-16 11:47:20

Re: Abiogeneis =spontaneous generation disproven by Pateur

James Stallion <red@[E

2008-03-16 11:55:22

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 4:49:25 CST 2008.