On Sep 2, 5:33 pm, ernie...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Ernie Primeau) wrote:
> is very simple, you simply remove your body and face hair from the
> follicles. It helps if you rub in a solution made of isopropyl alcohol
> and an anti-androgen such as saw palmetto extract or spiro to the area
> that the hair has just been removed from. That will slow the regrowth of
> that hair, and in time stop it.
> That allows the needed nutrients to grow hair to flow to the scalp hair
> follicles and revive them. Questions?. Ernie
What do you mean, "questions"?
Ernie, you have nothing to back up your claims. You just have your
assertions, and look at the source:
- a 65 year old man who is visibly quite bald in all pictures
available of him, and who doesn't even have the stones to stand behind
the pictures he posted,
- who regularly confuses hormones with "nutrients,"
- who hallucinates vast paranoid conspiratorial delusions of "asshole
farrel" wherever he is challenged, jeered, or criticized,
- who regularly denies entire swaths of established science based on
nothing but his own uninformed hunches (no experiments or research
like Folkman or Fleming - just hunches),
- who refuses to actually *engage* in science
- who engages in some of the most vile and disgusting exchanges (see
http://www.geocities.com/pluckngrow/vileposts.htm
for an annotated
list)
- who has no advanced degrees, much less a college degree, much less
any experience anyone can find in the fields of science or medicine
- who has been caught in more lies at this point than can be reliably
calculated (for many of the lies Ernie has told, see
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Ernie_Primeau)
- and etc.
..... so I have two questions:
1) why don't you provide proof your method works before you actually
tell us how to use it? Don't give me your song-and-dance about "Scott"
or "Maisie Dowell" or "Tyrone Z" again, because no one buys it.
2) if you're so convinced your method works, why don't you actually
show that it's the removal of body hair that does the trick? Why do
you suggest applying anti-androgens as a way of "removing body
hair" (which don't "remove" body hair at all, actually - and no one
but you thinks they do - they likely merely miniaturize body hair)?
Why don't you suggest, say, electrolosis, or waxing, which can be done
in one session, as opposed to constantly re-applying anti-androgens
all over the body in topical form? Your suggestions about how to use
your "method" don't make sense.
Here's my answers:
Obviously using spironolactone or saw palmetto applied to the body is
simply another method for getting the drug into the body systemically
- like swallowing anti-androgens in pill form, or like swallowng
finasteride pills - except in this case the spiro and the saw p get
into the bloodstream through the skin.
Everyone but you apparently knows that systemic application of anti-
androgens tends to reduce the growth of body hair and increase the
growth of scalp hair - because scalp hair and body hair react
differently to the presence of androgenic stimuli. That's the only
reason why smearing your body with anti-androgens would ever work -
it's a laughably inefficient way of getting anti-androgens into the
bloodstream - it's NOT a way of "removing body hair."
More questions for you:
Why do you keep this up, Ernie? C'mon, before you start frothing about
Folkman or Fleming or some other actual doctor or actual researcher
who has actually accomplished something in their lives, get a clue:
You're never going to get people to buy your laughable theories.
Your s****-oil business is done - over - finito. "Asshole farrel" put
the nails in that coffin years ago. Do you really want your antics on
this newsgroup to be how people remember you? I can get you Kook
Awards if you want them. Is that the recognition you're after? You're
an old man, Ernie, and you're not getting any younger. I can keep this
up as a bizarre hobby of mine for quite a long time, and I reckon it
will be long after you finally lose your battle with dementia - do you
want that?
Anyways, think it over, Ern.
|
