Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Professions > Astronomy > Exoretroforming...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 16 Topic 19023 of 19872
Post > Topic >>

Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming

by giveitawhirl2008 <giveitawhril2008@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 28, 2008 at 05:16 PM

Proposals for terraforming have been around for a good while now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraforming
But based on a scientific
and realistic view which continues to be ignored and censored, here is
a superior concept: I call it "Exoretroforming," because a Google
search on this term turned up nothing, while "Retroforming" has
existing definitions.

The scientific-biblical view of hundreds of fully qualified scientists
holds that God had the power to create the Universe in the twinkling
of an eye; however, He chose to take six calendar days to do it for
symbolic reasons of His own.

The original natural Creation was perfect. At the Fall of Man, all of
Creation - the entire Cosmos - was cursed and set on the road to self
destruction. Further implications gathered from the biblical account
of Earth history are that a second calamity befell at least the entire
inner solar system at time of the Flood of Noah. It is reasonably
extrapolatable that this "Second Curse" may have Universe-wide.

Before the Flood, Earth was NOT PERFECT but much MORE UTOPIAN than
after. It is proposed that this applies to all the worlds, systems and
galaxies across the entire Cosmos, as well.

Seeking to TERRAFORM planets meens trying to give them EARTH-LIKE
environments. I propose that is more rational and responsible to seek
to understand what the PRE-FLOOD-OF-NOAH/PRE-LOCAL-CATACLYSM
environment of each planet was, and to RESTORE THE ORIGINAL
ENVIRONMENT OF ***THAT*** PLANET, for each planet. NOT to TERRAFORM
it, which would give it an alien environment it never had and was
never meant to have!

Some planets probably WERE quite Earth-like, Others quite likely were
NOT, even if they had ecosystems! If, given enough time in a distant
future, we develop terraforming capabilities, we should Exoretroform,
instead. We would be restoring planets and any ecosystems to the way
they were supposed to be, NOT necessarily making them like Earth!

RE:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.bio.misc/browse_thread/thread/e34084fcddcf85f3/7f296ca48e48aa66?hl=en&lnk=st&q=dead+alien+life#7f296ca48e48aa66
 




 16 Posts in Topic:
Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
giveitawhirl2008 <give  2008-08-28 17:16:43 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
Saul Levy <saullevy1@[  2008-08-28 18:18:19 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
"Mark F." <r  2008-08-29 15:39:47 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
herbertglazier@[EMAIL PRO  2008-08-30 09:03:07 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2008-08-30 10:12:36 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
Saul Levy <saullevy1@[  2008-08-30 10:26:39 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
herbertglazier@[EMAIL PRO  2008-08-31 10:44:55 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2008-08-31 09:27:25 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
Saul Levy <saullevy1@[  2008-09-01 14:11:56 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
giveitawhirl2008 <give  2008-09-02 15:57:47 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
Saul Levy <saullevy1@[  2008-09-03 16:12:46 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2008-09-03 22:47:04 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2008-08-31 05:50:34 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
Saul Levy <saullevy1@[  2008-09-01 06:36:38 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2008-09-03 22:39:05 
Re: Exoretroforming .VS. Terrafroming
Saul Levy <saullevy1@[  2008-09-04 12:41:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 7:22:23 CST 2008.