In article <46851144.455B@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> We're talking past history, not the present. Current
>> presidential popularity isn't the issue, except maybe to Edmo.
>> Everyone here is referring to his failed predictions that
>> George Bush would lose both presidential elections.
>Wrong!
Sorry, Eddy, but he's right and you are the one that's wrong.
Your predictions failed and you can't change that by waving your
hands.
>Stalker!
Oh, please. Disagreeing with you on Usenet does not constitute
stalking. But something like this does:
"I drove to LA last night !!!! Where is it you say you lived? I
will come and visit while I am here." --Edmond H. Wollmann
>We are proving my accurate prediction of his failed presidency
>because HE STOLE the two elections YOU SAY he won.
Do you actually believe yourself when you write those lies? ROFLMFAO!
>I say he LOST.
Say it all you want. Your ability to ignore reality is one of the
reasons you continue to be a failure.
>I am PROVING that that intention and action ENSURED his failure
>and predicted it because of my sureness of that fact.
Yawn. All you are proving is that you are a pathetic old man will
no hope of prosperity due to your inability to recognize and
correct your faults.
BTW, Eddy, this site is still up:
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
Looks like you remain powerless!
