On Aug 22, 9:30 pm, CFA wrote:
> E. H. Wollmann - The One Who Rules wrote:
> >On Aug 19, 3:13 pm, CFA wrote:
> >> JB wrote:
> >> > <sigh> You DO realise, of course, that any "Readings" you give
have=
a
> >> >2.000 year distention, right? If they have ANY benifit at ALL -
they'd
> >> >be accurate 2.000 years ago, not now. Precession and all that. All,
I
> >> >mean ALL of your meanderings are predicated on falsehoods. Choke on
i=
t=2E
> >> Precession isn't the problem with astrology.
> >> And did you have to quote the whole article?
> >> Ken
> >The "problem" is not with astrology per se,
> Right. It's with arrogant ****heads like you.
I see, how am I responsible for the misperceptions of astrologers?
> >but astrologers who lack critical thinking skills...
> As if you had the slightest clue what I meant.
Alright, explain then. I thought Ptolemy explained it very well. Most
non-astrologers come up with these infantile arguments that evidence
only their lack of astrological understanding, not any real criticism
of astrology--or astrologers.
> >Who believe in fairy tales
> Such as?
That people have "massive aspect networks" etc. as you have described
that "make them" act in such and such a way or that "brings things
upon them" in a karmic way, or other such limited mindless judgmental
thinking patterns.
> > and that they are not destined by their own choices.
> Put down the mirror.
> Ken
Gee, I wrote a whole book other astrologers are afraid to acknowledge
that PROVES we create our reality, why would a mirror be needed for
me?
> cfa at alt dot net
"Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend. Just what you want
to be, you'll be in the end." The Moody Blues
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
=A9 2007 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Articles http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/info.htm
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/TOC.htm
|
